Spiritual damage in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights:: The logic of legal reasoning of Judge Cançado Trindade in the case of Moiwana versus Suriname
Spiritual damage in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights:: The logic of legal reasoning of Judge Cançado Trindade in the case of Moiwana versus Suriname
Document
metadata
Summary
The objective of this research is to discover the logic of legal argumentation of the concept of spiritual damage that was first developed in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in 2005 by Judge Cançado Trindade during the trial session of the denunciation of the Afro-descendant community Moiwana against the State of Suriname. With this purpose, six categories of inventories of knowledge will be articulated and sequential projection of Judge Cançado Trindade's logic of argument and, consequently, the epistemological structure of own concept of spiritual damage.Keywords: spiritual damages, logic of legal argumentation, human rights
Latin American Magazine of Law and Religion; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2019): Freedom of expression, religious symbols and communication of the religious phenomenon; 1-51
Editor
Law School. Pontifical Catholic University of Chile
Date
2019-08-19
Guy
Article
Issue
spiritual damage
Format
application/pdf
Rights
Copyright 2019 Heraldo Elias Montarroyos
Language
spa
Qualification
Spiritual damage in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights:: The logic of legal reasoning of Judge Cançado Trindade in the case of Moiwana versus Suriname